No-code integration platform for rich bi-directional sync
Zero downtime migration to tool of your choice
Keep Historical Data, Without Slowing Down Your Tools
Migrate or restructure Azure DevOps Instances
Real-time, context-rich data lake for AI or analytics
By Role
Accelerate delivery with clear insights
Transform smarter with a connected digital thread
Confident transitions for every enterprise change
By Initiative
Modernize and move to cloud without disruption
Modernize legacy systems for a connected enterprise
Build a compliant digital thread for complex environments
Build the foundation for smarter AI
By Domain
No-code integration across teams & systems
Enable collaboration between IT, support & business teams
Connect PLM & engineering teams for smarter products
Ensure regulatory compliance from start to release
Explore the latest in technology and best practices
Success stories from the field
Actionable insights for your business challenges.
See solutions in action
Learn, plan, and execute with confidence
Official announcements and updates
Join discussions that drive results
Stay ahead with curated insights
Evaluate before you buy
Explore the latest in technology and best practices
Success stories from the field
Actionable insights for your business challenges.
See solutions in action
Learn, plan, and execute with confidence
Official announcements and updates
Join discussions that drive results
Stay ahead with curated insights
Moving between Azure DevOps organizations or tenants? This guide covers moves, merges, and splits, what migrates, your options, and the five stages to run it. OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps (OM4ADO) supports it with history, user identity mapping across tenants, and delta migration, so teams keep working.
Zephyr integration means connecting Zephyr with another system so that test data and the records it relates to move between them automatically. A test case in Zephyr traces back to a requirement and forward to a defect, and those records often live in different tools. Connecting them keeps one consistent picture across the lifecycle, so a change on one side is reflected on the other without anyone re-keying it.
Teams connect Zephyr for traceability and visibility. Linking requirements to test cases shows what has been tested and what has not. Linking tests and defects to development work keeps engineering and QA aligned. And keeping all of it in sync supports audit-readiness, because the trail from requirement to test to result to defect stays intact across systems.
A rich Zephyr integration moves far more than a status field. The records that can sync across a pairing include:
Test cases, test cycles, test steps, executions and results.
Folders, so the structure around the tests is kept, not just the tests.
Requirements and work items from the connected system.
Defects raised from a failed test.
Attachments, comments, mentions and the links between records, so traceability and context come across too.
Because both simple fields and detailed, structured test records move together, the two systems hold the same picture rather than a thinned-down copy.
Whichever pairing is in scope, the same practices make a Zephyr integration reliable:
Map the records and fields first. Agree how Zephyr test cases, executions and results match the other system’s requirements, issues or work items before switching anything on.
Set the sync direction on purpose. Decide field by field what is one way and what is two way, so neither system overwrites the other by accident.
Keep the links. Preserve the relationships between requirements, tests, results and defects, since the traceability is the point of the integration.
Let conflicts and errors be handled automatically. Use built-in conflict resolution and automatic retries so a clash or a temporary failure does not cause data to drift.
Run the integration outside the connected tools. An integration that works through each system’s APIs, rather than as a plugin inside them, keeps both tools running at full speed.
OpsHub Integration Manager is a no-code platform that connects Zephyr with Jama, Jira and Azure DevOps, and is built around the practices above. Its strengths for a Zephyr integration are:
Ease of use with no code. Integrations are set up by configuration rather than by building and maintaining a custom codebase.
Rich data sync without scripts or plugins. Sync both simple fields and detailed test records, test cases, cycles, steps, executions, results, requirements, work items and defects, sync together, with attachments, comments, mentions and links.
No impact on the connected tools. The integration runs outside Zephyr and the other system and works through their APIs, so neither tool is slowed down.
Two-way sync with the links preserved, so traceability holds across both systems.
Built-in error handling and conflict resolution, with automatic retries, an error queue and detailed logs, so records recover instead of drifting.
Flexible deployment, on-premise or cloud, which suits systems behind a firewall.
Because it is configured rather than coded, a team can set up and adjust a Zephyr integration quickly, while still getting two-way sync, full traceability and automatic recovery.
Are there tools that integrate Zephyr with Jira, Jama or Azure DevOps?
Yes. A dedicated integration platform can connect Zephyr with Jira, Jama or Azure DevOps and keep test cases, executions, results and defects in sync. OpsHub Integration Manager connects Zephyr with all three, with two-way sync and the links between records preserved.
How do I integrate Zephyr with Jama for requirements traceability?
Match Jama requirements to the Zephyr test cases that verify them, decide which fields move in each direction, and keep the links. Requirements then show their test coverage, and executions, results and defects flow back, so each requirement reflects whether it has passed, failed or is untested.
What is the best way to sync Zephyr test cases and defects with Jira?
Map Zephyr test cases and defects to the matching Jira issue types and fields, set the sync direction for each, and preserve the links. A defect from a failed test then becomes a Jira issue with its context intact, and its status flows back to Zephyr as the development team works it.
Does integrating Zephyr slow down the connected tools?
It should not, if the integration runs outside the tools and works through their APIs rather than as a plugin inside them. OpsHub Integration Manager runs separately from Zephyr and the connected system, so neither is slowed down.
Can a Zephyr integration sync data in both directions?
Yes. A two-way integration keeps a record matched on both sides as either one changes, as long as the sync direction is set per field and conflicts are handled. This keeps Zephyr and the connected system consistent rather than one being a read-only copy.
Which Zephyr entities can be synced to another system?
Test cases, test cycles, test steps, executions and results, along with folders, requirements, work items, defects, attachments, comments, mentions and the links between records, so both the test data and its traceability move across.
Talk through connecting Zephyr with Jama, Jira or Azure DevOps, with no-code setup, two-way sync and full traceability.
Have more questions about your use case?
See how OpsHub looks like in your environment
