Jira Cloud Migration: No Downtime, Disruption-Free

The project management landscape keeps evolving, pushing modern teams to the cloud. Migrating to Atlassian Jira Cloud offers continuous updates, unmatched scalability, and ironclad security – all empowering your teams to conquer high-impact tasks. However moving from your current setup can be disruptive, potentially impacting data accuracy and productivity. This video shows you how to navigate this transition smoothly without any disruption and downtime. Watch now to learn more!

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

The digital landscape is shifting. Customers demand more. Competition is fierce relying on yesterday’s technology holds you back. Organizations today face a strategic imperative: embrace the Cloud. Jira Cloud fuels your journey to high-impact work. Imagine the possibilities, continuous updates, limitless scalability and robust security. But the road to Cloud Modernization can be daunting. Traditional cold, Lift & Shift approaches are risky.

Picture your source system inoperable, operations grinding to a halt, vital data jeopardized and massive operational and compliance costs. This is not the tool modernization you want. The answer lies in an agile migration strategy, one that is seamless, disruption-free, fosters collaboration and maintains high data fidelity.

Designed to address the complexities of large-scale migrations, OpsHub Migration Manager (OMM) tackles your migration concerns head-on. It keeps your teams rolling during migrations and enables teams still using existing with Jira cloud teams by reverse syncing data from Jira to their existing tool.

Additionally, OMM safeguards your data integrity putting your compliance worries to rest Ready to experience new way to modernize your tools? Effortless modernization starts today!

How to Migrate from DOORS Next Generation to Codebeamer

Teams migrate to Codebeamer to streamline their workflows and manage risks, requirements, and quality more effectively without any disruptions. This video showcases a high-fidelity migration from IBM DOORS Next Generation (DOORS NG) to Codebeamer using OpsHub Migration Manager (OMM), with zero downtime. All artefacts created in DOORS NG seamlessly migrate over, maintaining data consistency and preserving context, guaranteeing no data loss post-migration. Have a look!

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

The video showcases a high-fidelity, zero downtime migration to PTC Codebeamer. All artifacts in DOORS NG migrate seamlessly with complete data integrity and consistency, ensuring there is no loss of information.

On the left side of the screen, we have DOORS NG, and on the right, we have Codebeamer. Different components in DOORS NG are mapped to different trackers in Codebeamer. Component C in DOORS NG is mapped to User Stories in Codebeamer. In component C, we have 13 artifacts. Component A in DOORS NG is mapped to Customer Requirement Specifications in Codebeamer. Component A has 11 artifacts. Component B in DOORS NG is mapped to system requirement specifications in Codebeamer. As you can see, currently Codebeamer is empty, and no artifacts are present here.

While the migration is in progress, teams can continue their work in both systems. On refreshing, we can see that all the work items of company B in DOORS NG have migrated to system requirement specifications in Codebeamer. Opening a requirement to see if all the details associated with it has migrated. The Remote link, remote ID and the status have successfully synchronized.

The Severity in Codebeamer is mapped to Priority in DOORS NG which is high. The description and comment have also synchronized. Under History, we can see there are five revisions in Codebeamer. Let’s quickly compare this history with DOORS NG. We can see the 5 revisions here which are synchronized. The first revision is the create revision, second revision is the comment, third revision is the modification in the Primary Text or the Description. The Primary Text was mapped to Description in Codebeamer. We can see all the revisions have synchronized.

The link in DOORS NG is also reflecting under Association in Codebeamer. By clicking on this link, we can see the Description and the Attachment have successfully synchronized. Similarly, checking the other components which have migrated. Component C in DOORS NG was mapped to User stories in Codebeamer.

Let’s compare the information between both the systems. The status, Remote Link, Remote ID, Description, and both comments have synchronized successfully. The Association has also synchronized. On clicking, we can navigate to the description in bold which has synchronized retaining the formatting. The comment and attachment have also synchronized.

Now, let’s check component A which was mapped to Customer Requirement Specifications in Codebeamer. All 11 artifacts in Component A in DOORS NG have synchronized to Codebeamer.

Let’s click on an artifact to check the details associated with it. The description in bullets has synchronized in the same format. The Remote Link, status, and Remote ID are also visible here. The priority was mapped to a customer priority field. We can also see the association synchronized. By clicking on it, we can see the details under it have also synchronized successfully. The priority set to high, the description has synchronized.

Thank you for watching!

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Migrating to Jira Cloud

For modern enterprises, agility and efficiency are critical for success. Jira cloud migration is no longer optional; it is essential for boosting team productivity and ROI. However, cloud migration can significantly impact business operations, revenue, data security, and costs if not approached with care.
This demo showcases how to achieve a no downtime, zero disruption Jira cloud migration, eliminating interruptions while maximizing benefits. Additionally, it demonstrates how changes made during the Jira Cloud migration to the source effortlessly reflect in the target, ensuring complete visibility between IBM DOORS and Jira Cloud. Take a look!

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

This video shows how to seamlessly migrate your projects to the Cloud with zero downtime, minimising disruption and maximising the benefits. In this video we will be migrating two different IBM Rational DOORS modules into a single Jira project. We are using DOORS as an example in this demo. You can migrate any tool to Jira Cloud.

Following the steps on the screen, we can see the first DOORS module created by the product manager, under which we have stories and bugs. These are defined by a custom attribute which is Issue type. In the bugs and stories, we can see the descriptions are formatted which include tables and Ole objects embedded as files or attachments. We can also see the text in the description formatted in bold and underlined. All the details visible here will migrate to the Jira project, retaining the formatting.

Similarly, in the second module in DOORS, we can see the bugs and stories created with the custom attribute and the descriptions in rich text formatting which include bullets and Ole objects amongst others. In both modules, the red and yellow arrows indicate the in and out links configured between the bugs and stories to retain complete traceability between the source and target systems during the migration.

Navigating to Jira, currently, we see the Jira project is empty. OpsHub Migration Manager (OMM) is working in the background checking for the modules to migrate from DOORS to Jira Cloud.

Let’s refresh the page to see if the migrated data is visible. Now the bugs and stories from those are reflecting here in Jira.

Let’s open a story to view the migrated data. We can see OMM has been able to bring over all the details from DOORS to Jira, including the table and other formatted details. Here is the Remote ID and Remote Link which will navigate you to the specific DOORS item, increasing traceability between the two systems. Similarly, other stories and bugs are created in DOORS with tables, Ole Objects, discussions, and associated links. Here, the story is associated with the bug have all migrated to JIRA Cloud. The Ole Object from DOORS is available in Jira as a file and as an attachment. The linkage created between the story and the bug is also preserved between the source and target systems.

The discussion in DOORS has synchronised to Jira as comments. Let’s quickly look at the details of the associated bug which too have migrated from DOORS. The developer now updates a story in Jira. The changes made to the title and the newly added comment will automatically migrate to DOORS.

OMM’s Reverse Synchronization enables users to sync data back from their target to source during the migration. We can also make changes to our source system while the migration is in progress. All the changes made in the interim will reflect in both systems automatically. Let’s take a look at the DOORS object which was recently updated in JIRA. Since the summary in Jira is synced to Short Text in DOORS, the updated information has bidirectionally synced and is available under Short Text.

Here, the bidirectional synchronization allows changes made in one system to automatically reflect in the other. Under discussions, we can see the comment added in Jira has synchronised as well.

Let’s make a quick update to the description in DOORS to see if it migrates back to Jira. One final time In Jira, opening the story, which was updated in DOORS, we can see the updated description as bidirectionally synchronised and is visible here.

That completes the demo. Thank you for watching.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Azure DevOps Migration Tool for VSTS Migration

OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps (OM4ADO) is a tool used to migrate Azure DevOps projects across organizations and environments with zero downtime. OM4ADO simplifies consolidation efforts across various Azure DevOps organizations, eliminating challenges such as high maintenance costs, reduced productivity, and insufficient reporting. It seamlessly migrates work items, test entities and more enhancing business agility. Developed in collaboration with Microsoft, OM4ADO helps in comprehensive transfer of data with full context within the Microsoft landscape whether it is a TFS to Azure DevOps (VSTS) migration or an Azure DevOps to Azure DevOps migration or any other combination of the two instances. OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps(OM4ADO) also allows you to efficiently bulk edit work items, transfer data between organizations and collections. The delta sync feature enables incremental Azure DevOps migration by synchronizing only changes between source and target, allowing uninterrupted use of the source system during validation. Watch this video to learn how OM4ADO migrates data from VSTS to VSTS hassle-free!

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

In this video, we will show how OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps (OM4ADO) migrates data from ADO Cloud to ADO Cloud. Here, we have the ADO source instance on the left and the ADIO target instance on the right. Currently, the target instance is empty. OM4ADO will seamlessly migrate the project from the source to the target instance with zero downtime and no data loss. Here, you can see, we have created a source instance by the name, “OpsHubDemoMigration” and several projects under this organization. You can find more information regarding the source incidents from the Organization settings option. 

To create a project in cloud-to-cloud migrations, we first need to create a process template. OM4ADO will support the migration of all process templates. The “Web Development Project” is created under this custom process template, “AgileInherited”. Based on these process templates, we will create the projects in the target. Let’s go back to the web development project, which we will migrate from source to target. By clicking on the Project, you can view details added under the same as the description and members associated with it under project settings. In the Team section, you can view the list of teams created. You can create as many teams as you need. You can also assign members to the teams. This, too, can be customized as per your requirement. 

Under the Project configuration option, we have created a hierarchy of iterations. Under Iterations, we have created several sprints, and under this sprint, we have created a child. Under the Areas configuration, we can see multiple parent-child hierarchies created. You can click on the Team configuration option to view iterations and areas. 

Now let’s take a look at the project configurations. Under the Wiki section, we can see two kinds of options, Project wiki and Code wikis. Under the project wiki, we have created the “Web-Development wiki”. We have configured the web-development wiki with different configurations like meta links, hyperlinks, a table which includes the link reference and user mention, and inline image and screenshot. Let’s take a quick look at the Code wikis. 

Moving to the work items to be migrated, we can see a list of work items which have been created by different teams. These are the work item types. OM4ADO will migrate all the data under the work items like the title, description in rich text formatting, inline image, links, attachments etc. In near to real-time, under Boards, we can see the Web Development Board and the UI Dev Board have been configured with settings related to boards like custom stream lanes, color-coded card rules and columns. 

These other advanced settings in both, OM4ADO will migrate boards with all the configured settings from source to target. Under Sprints, we can see the capacity assigned to members of different teams. Under the Backend Dev team, all four members have been assigned per day capacity. Under the Repository option, we have created two repositories, pointing to the web development project with the name, Web Development and Backend Data. As of now, we will migrate only the Web Development repository to target. Here is the data regarding this web development repository. 

Navigating to commits, the information regarding the commits will be reflected in this Commit tab. Under the Branches tab, you can see two branches that have been created. Under the web development repository, you can create custom branches as per requirement. OpsHub will migrate all repositories along with branches to the target. Under Pull Request, you can view information regarding the same. 

We have also created a CI / CD pipeline in the source by the name Web Development CI under the Web Development project. By clicking on the edit button, you can see the information related to the Web Development CI pipeline like the name agent specification, agent job, etc. We can also create a custom variable related to the pipeline. Information regarding triggers is available under the Trigger section. You can customise the schedule trigger as per need. OM4ADO’s migration will migrate all the data from source to target without any loss of context or downtime with full traceability. This completes part one of the demo where we showed all the information in the source system which will migrate to the target system using OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps. 

OM4ADO migrates data in 5 simple steps on the OM4ADO homepage. The first step is to provide the source end point and destination endpoint details. In the second step, you need to provide the migration details. Here, you can select the boxes, the data for which you want to migrate. In the third step, you need to select the projects which you want to migrate from source to target. Here, we will select the Web development project which was created in the source as shown in part one of the demo. You can select multiple projects at a time but make sure to have the same project name and template at both endpoints. 

In the fourth step, you need to provide users for mapping. OM4ADO will map the users automatically where the display names are the same between the two systems. You can map the default user in the source with any user in the destination as per your project requirement. By clicking Next, you will navigate to the fifth step to view the migration validation summary and start the migration. The OM4ADO tool will validate the difference between the source and target process templates. 

In the migration summary, we can see the project web development has been found in the target, and therefore, we can successfully migrate the data. Once the validation is complete, we will click on finish and the tool will automatically create the configuration. The configuration may take some time. Once the configuration is complete, we will click on Yes on the pop up to begin the migration. 

The migration for meta entities is done, and therefore, the status is reflected as completed. The work items have started to migrate from source to target. You can see the status is running and the number of work items which have migrated successfully. The entire migration may take a few minutes. Finally, we can see the migration process has been completed in all the stages. 

Now, let’s move to the target instance to verify the migrated data. With the source instance, we can see the web development project created in the source has migrated to the target. Let’s see if the custom process template created in the source has migrated to target. In the Organization setting under Process, we can see the Agile inherited process template in the source and target. The web development project under the custom process template has also migrated to target. We saw the recently migrated web development project. 

Now, let’s check if all the details added under it have also been successfully migrated. We can see the exact description has migrated to target and so have the members assigned to the project. Under the wiki section, we can see both the wikis created in source have migrated to target. 

The Web development Wiki created under the Project Wiki is successfully reflected in the target with the same details as the source. Here, we can see the migrated meta links, tables with link reference and user mention as well as the inline image, and screenshot. Similarly, we can see the code wiki has migrated from source to target with all its details. 

Navigating to the work items which have migrated, the list of work items with the respective teams is available in the target. All the formatting and additions made to the work items in the source including the title, description in rich text formatting like bold and italics, inline image link, an attachment has migrated successfully. 

Under Boards, we can see the UI Development Board with configured settings like custom stream lanes, color-coded card rules and columns have migrated from sourced to target under sprints. The capacity assigned to the backend dev team in the source is successfully reflected here in the target under the repository section. The web development repository has migrated with all the data added under it. 

The information regarding the comments is also visible in the target. All the branches created in the source have also migrated successfully navigating to pipelines. The web development CI pipeline created in the source has migrated to target and so has all the configured information related to it like the name, agent specification, agent job, etc. The custom variables added to the pipeline in the source are also visible in the target. The information regarding triggers has also migrated to the target from the source. 

The advanced configurations which have migrated from source to target are also visible under the Options tab under Project Settings in the Team section. The list of teams created in the source are visible now in the target post the migration under the team configuration option, we can see the migrated hierarchy of iterations and the area. 

This completes the migration from Azure DevOps Services to Services using OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps. OM4ADO also provides a flexible cutover by allowing users to sync additional delta to target after the migration is complete. 

Thank you for watching this video. 

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Jira – GitHub Migration & Integration

Managing data from disparate sources requires strong collaboration and prompt communication between teams. Without this, organizations end up with inaccurate or outdated data and duplication of data. Migrating and integrating Jira and GitHub allows cross-functional departments to streamline their workflows and improve teamwork. In this video, watch a no-downtime, high-fidelity migration from Jira to GitHub with full historical context and seamless bidirectional integration between the two systems synchronizing data in near to real-time.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

In this demo, we will start by migrating the 5 stories displayed on the screen from Jira to GitHub. Currently, no open issues are visible in GitHub. The OpsHub admin has started the migration in the background, and we will see all 5 stories migrate from Jira to GitHub without any downtime. Let’s refresh the page to see if the migration in progress is successful. We can see that the stories have started to appear in GitHub. The comments associated with the stories are also getting migrated. All 5 stories have successfully migrated to GitHub as issues.

The OpsHub admin keeps the migration running in the background to sync all the updates. Once, all the work items are migrated, the developer opens them to check if all the details have synchronized successfully or not. All details including the heading, labels, and descriptions with the rich text field like bullets, bold, date and table have synchronized from Jira to GitHub.

In this demo, we have made customized configurations to show the Remote ID field in GitHub for Jira stories since GitHub does not have a custom field option to choose the Remote ID. In Jira, we can see the Remote ID and link of the GitHub issues. By clicking on the links, you can access the Jira story from GitHub and the GitHub issue from Jira. The comments under the Jira stories are also visible in the GitHub issue with the RTF formatting. This completes the migration from Jira to GitHub.

Now, let us create an issue at GitHub and synchronize the information to Jira. The developer in GitHub adds a new issue, adds a title and description in RTF. All details along with the label added in GitHub will in near to real-time synchronize to Jira. Navigating to Jira, the engineer refreshes the page to view the issue from GitHub which has synchronized to Jira as a story.

All details, including the description in bold and bullet and the label have successfully synced. Here, we can see the Remote Link and Remote ID of the GitHub issue. Continuing in Jira, the engineer adds a comment for the developer in GitHub. These two, with all its formatting will bidirectionally synchronize back to GitHub. Back in GitHub we can see that the comment from Jira is visible here. The developer now adds a response for the engineer in Jira. This comment too will sync back in near to real-time. Refreshing the page in Jira, the comment added in GitHub is visible here.

Going back to GitHub, the developer changes the status of the issue to closed, indicating completion of the work. One last time, in Jira, the engineer refreshes the page of the story to find the status has synced from GitHub, and therefore, the integration between Jira and GitHub reflects “done”.

That completes the demo. Thank you for watching.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

IBM DOORS – PTC’s codebeamer Migration

Modernizing requirements management tool becomes a business imperative as product complexity grows and teams expect a modern, agile and feature-rich user experience. However, migration projects can be tricky owing to the vast amounts of legacy data and the need to deliver value throughout the migration. Traditional approaches to tool migration such as Big Bang may not be the right option considering the downtime and disruption implications. Watch this migration demo to learn how to migrate data using two effective strategies – Rip and Replace and Coexist – using IBM DOORS (a legacy tool) and PTC’s codebeamer (a modern tool). With OpsHub’s migration tool, both strategies can be implemented without data loss, downtime, or disruption.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

In today’s demo, both the “Rip & Replace” strategy, and the “Coexist” strategy will be demonstrated. First, the Rip and Replace strategy will be shown by migrating data from the legacy tool, IBM DOORS, to PTC’s Codebeamer. While the data migration occurs, updates will be made to DOORS requirements and see how these changes are also migrated to Codebeamer.

After the migration demo, the Coexist strategy will be demonstrated. In this part, changes will be made in Codebeamer to show how data can coexist in both Codebeamer and DOORS, enabling teams to work seamlessly across both tools.

On the screen is Codebeamer, which currently has no requirements and is an empty project, and DOORS, which has around 20 requirements. A variety of data combinations have been created, including a parent-child hierarchy. Some requirements contain complex data like images, xlxs file, and other attachments.

The migration has already been pre-configured. Once triggered, the migration interface will be closed, and the focus will be on interacting with Codebeamer and DOORS in the background while the migration tool transfers data from DOORS to Codebeamer.

Refreshing the page, the migration is progressing, and the hierarchy of requirements from DOORS is being replicated in Codebeamer. The images and other data have been successfully migrated.

For legacy tool users migrating to Codebeamer, there will be no loss of data. All data from the legacy tool is visible in Codebeamer, enabling users to work with the same dataset in a more modern tool.

After another refresh, more requirements appear. The first requirement can now be opened, with the title, assigned user, and other details exactly as they were in DOORS. Users can also sync the DOORS requirement ID in the fields if needed.

The description and attachments have been successfully migrated. After a final refresh, all requirements are visible in Codebeamer, with all rich text data, including tables and bullet points, preserved.

Next, an update will be made to one of the requirements in DOORS. “Code Review and User Testing” will have its description changed to “Functional design review is required.” After saving, the migration tool will automatically detect the change in the background and bring it over to Codebeamer.

Refreshing Codebeamer, the updated description is now reflected for the same requirement.

The Codebeamer team will now change the status to “Waiting for Approval” and update the description accordingly. After saving, the Coexist strategy is now in place. The data from the legacy tool has been migrated into Codebeamer, but both tools are still in use, ensuring that users work on the latest data regardless of the platform.

Finally, the updates can be checked in DOORS. The “Waiting for Approval” description has been added, and the status has been updated to “In Progress,” as configured by the migration tool. The status mapping ensures that “Waiting for Approval” in Codebeamer corresponds to “In Progress” in DOORS.

As demonstrated, organizations can choose between the Rip & Replace or Coexist strategy, depending on their needs. Both strategies are supported by the OpsHub migration tool, ensuring no data loss during the migration process.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

IBM DOORS – Modern Requirements4DevOps Migration

Adopting an incremental, agile, and high-fidelity content migration approach can significantly help enterprises with enhanced cross-functional collaboration and improve their requirements process. For example, migrating data from IBM DOORS to Modern Requirements4DevOps using OpsHub Migration Manager (OMM) helps enterprises create a unified ecosystem with a central source of truth. Watch the following migration demo video to learn how OMM facilitates high fidelity data migration along with history and no data loss from IBM DOORS to Modern Requirements4DevOps with Azure DevOps built on top of it. This, in turn, helps enterprises to modernize their requirements at their comfort and pace without compromising data integrity and compliance.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

Video Transcript

In this demo, requirements will be migrated from IBM DOORS to Modern Requirements. The Modern Requirements UI, built on top of Azure DevOps, will be used for this process. All requirements from IBM DOORS will be migrated to the Project Demo project. Currently, there are no backlogs, and the project is empty. Let’s quickly review the data in DOORS that will be migrated.

The data is stored in the Migration Demo module, which contains several requirements. These requirements are organized hierarchically with parent, child, and child of child relationships. Some of the data includes attachments, such as images and files.

The properties of the requirements are visible once opened. For example, the status is assigned to Seema, with the status set to “Resolved” and the priority set to 1. Additionally, all historical events related to the requirements, including status changes and user actions, will be migrated. For instance, the status changed from “None” to “Active,” and then from “Active” to “Resolved” on March 29th. Once migrated to Modern Requirements, this history will be preserved.

Another requirement contains a table and formatted data, which, along with the history and attributes, will be migrated as well. The migration has been pre-configured, and it will take just a minute to transfer all the requirements to Modern Requirements.

Refreshing the browser, most of the requirements are already visible, and the hierarchy remains intact, just as seen in DOORS. During migration, users still using DOORS will experience no disruption.

Let’s view one of the migrated requirements. The title and description are identical to the original in DOORS. The full status transition, including users and dates, is also replicated in Modern Requirements.

For end users, the transition from DOORS to Modern Requirements will be seamless. They will see the same data but gain access to enhanced features and functionality.

The hierarchy of parent, child, and child of child requirements is also retained. Refreshing again, all requirements are present. Opening another requirement, the attachments, or OLE objects, are carried over. In DOORS, two attachments were added: a Word document and a text file. These attachments remain unchanged when migrated.

The data is preserved with all formatting intact, ensuring there is no data loss. The tool has only been upgraded for better functionality. For users who need the DOORS requirement ID, it’s available in a field, and any comments or discussions from DOORS are retained, with the same user and timestamp.

Let’s now simulate a scenario where changes are made in DOORS while migration is ongoing. The DOORS team updates a requirement called “Creating a SAS Application,” adding “Cloud Computing” to the description and marking it as “Resolved.” These changes are saved and closed in DOORS.

While migration continues, a user in Modern Requirements updates the description, adding a short text. This change is saved and closed as well.

This demonstrates that migration isn’t a one-time event. While the migration happens, ongoing changes must also be migrated to Modern Requirements.

In Modern Requirements, the status is marked as “Resolved,” and the description is updated with “Cloud Computing.”

Importantly, during this demo, OpsHub is nowhere in the picture. This is the experience users will have—both in Modern Requirements and DOORS. Checking DOORS, the changes made in Modern Requirements, such as the addition of “Elastic Caching” and a search field, are reflected in DOORS as well.

This concludes the demo.

Experience scalable, non-disruptive migration with OMM

Schedule a free 30-minute live demo with our migration experts

With OpsHub Migrator for Microsoft Azure DevOps (OM4ADO), enterprises can migrate from heterogeneous legacy systems onto unified agile platforms with zero system downtime.

OM4ADO supports 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2019 versions of Azure DevOps Server (TFS) and all versions of Azure DevOps Services (VSTS), including the latest version.

OM4ADO comes in three editions: Community Edition, Professional Edition, and Ultimate Edition.

To learn in detail about the feature differences in the Community Edition and Ultimate Edition, download the feature comparison sheet.

Please download the Community Edition from the Visual Studio Gallery.

To purchase the commercial edition, please fill the Contact Us form.